Today’s energy stock split was the most interesting point.
Oil services and refiners went up, but oil & gas explorers went down.
For example:
Oil service leaders SLB / HAL / BKR rose as much as +9%.
Top refiner VLO also rose about +9%.
But explorers like FANG and EXE fell about 3% on average.
The gap was very clear.
Looking back, the market was trading two very different ideas:
1. Oil services and refiners went up 📈
Logic: “Pick and shovel.”
Explanation:
Trump clearly said the U.S. would help revive Venezuela’s oil industry.
Venezuela’s oil system is broken. It needs repairs, drilling, and upgrades.
Result:
This is good for oil service firms like SLB and HAL.
They can get more contracts and more revenue.
Oil prices do not matter much, because the work still must be done.
Refiners (like Valero) may also benefit, because they may get cheaper heavy oil in the future.
2. Oil explorers went down 📉
Logic: “Supply shock.”
Explanation:
The market already worries about too much oil supply.
There is also pressure from possible OPEC+ supply increases.
If Venezuela comes back, more oil will enter the global market.
Result:
This is bad for U.S. explorers with no Venezuela exposure (like EXE and FANG).
More supply means lower oil price expectations.
Lower prices mean less profit.
So these stocks fell.
Bottom line
Money is betting that infrastructure spending comes first,
and the real supply increase comes later.
So the trade is:
Buy the workers (services), sell the producers (domestic explorers).
This pair trade works in the short term,
but not in the medium term.
When the gap becomes extreme (top 5% from the average),
this relationship is likely to flip.
Add comment
Comments